"Airport searches are the most common encounters between Americans and law enforcement agents. That's why it is so important for TSA agents to do the job they were trained to do and not engage in fishing expeditions that do nothing to promote flight safety," said Ben Wizner, a staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project. "It is, of course, very important to ensure the safety of flights and keep illegal weapons and explosives off planes. But allowing TSA screeners to conduct general purpose law enforcement searches violates the Constitution while diverting limited resources from TSA's core mission of protecting safety. For the sake of public safety and constitutional values, these unlawful searches should stop."
On March 29, 2009, Steven Bierfeldt was detained in a small room at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport and interrogated by TSA officials for nearly half an hour after he passed a metal box containing cash through a security checkpoint X-ray machine. Bierfeldt was carrying the cash in connection with his duties as the director of development for the Campaign for Liberty, a political organization that grew out of Congressman Ron Paul's presidential campaign.
Bierfeldt was detained and questioned as he returned home from a Campaign for Liberty event transporting proceeds from the sale of tickets, t-shirts, stickers, and campaign material. Bierfeldt repeatedly asked the agents to explain the scope of their authority to detain and interrogate him and received no explanation. Instead, the agents escalated the threatening tone of their questions and ultimately told Bierfeldt that he was being placed under arrest. Bierfeldt recorded the audio of the entire incident with his iPhone.
"I do not believe I should give up my constitutional rights each time I choose to travel by plane. I was doing nothing illegal or suspicious, yet I was treated like a potential criminal and harassed for no reason," said Bierfeldt. "Most Americans would be surprised to learn that TSA considers simply carrying cash to be a basis for detention and questioning. I hope the court makes clear that my detention by TSA agents was unconstitutional and stops TSA from engaging in these unlawful searches and arrests. I do not want another innocent American to have to endure what I went through."
"Mr. Bierfeldt's experience represents a troubling pattern of TSA attempting to transform its valid but limited search authority into a license to invade people's privacy in a manner that would never be accepted outside the airport context," said Larry Schwartztol, a staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project. "Just as the Constitution prevents the police on the street from conducting freewheeling searches in the hopes of uncovering wrongdoing, it protects travelers from the kind of treatment Mr. Bierfeldt suffered."
TSA officials have the authority to conduct safety-related searches for weapons and explosives. According to the ACLU's lawsuit, TSA agents are using heightened security measures after 9/11 as an excuse to exceed their search authority and engage in unlawful searches that violate the privacy rights of passengers. The lawsuit also charges that unconstitutional searches and detention by TSA agents have become the norm.
The ACLU's lawsuit was filed against Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, which has authority over TSA. It was filed in federal court in Washington, DC.
Attorneys on the case are Wizner, Scott Michelman and Allen Hopper of the ACLU, Art Spitzer of the ACLU National Capital Area and cooperating attorney Alan Gura of Gura and Possessky, PLLC.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Study says SB, DVBE utilization strengthens economy
Excerpt and information taken from DBEgoodfaith.com newsletter:
In recent years, the State of California's small business (SB) and disabled veteran business enterprise (DVBE) programs, which aim to increase the utilization of these firms through various measures, has been accused of diluting the public works market and weakening the state's economy. A new study by two scholars at California State University, Sacramento challenges this assumption and claims that SB and DVBE utilization on state contracts is beneficial for California's economy.“The incremental value of the State’s awarding contracts to SBs and DVBEs is positive, resulting in tremendous net new job creation, creation of net new Gross State Product, net new labor income for California employees, and indirect business taxes,” the study concludes.One of the studies findings highlighted in a California Department of General Services (DGS) press release is that SBs and DVBES produce roughly 50 percent more economic activity per dollar than larger firms.In addition to crunching data, the professors' surveyed SB and DVBE firms, revealing correlations between bid attempts and bid success. “Bid success seems to be a function of the number of applications made. For example, 56.9% of the respondents who have bid two to five times have been successful at least once, and 85.4% of the respondents who bid for at least six contracts have been successful at least once,” states the study.Just over 60 percent of California's SBs and DVBEs have tried to obtain state contracts. Each year, the DGS attempts to contract at least 25 percent of all state contracts to SBs and 3 percent to DVBEs.The survey also revealed why more SB and DVBE firms have not competed for contracts. In the survey responses, over a quarter of the firms indicated that they were not aware of bid opportunities with the state. Still, an overwhelming majority of respondents – 76 percent - want to bid on state contracts.The studies results may have several implications for contractors and suppliers. First, it supports the continued existence of California's SB and DVBE programs. Second, it may spur the Department of General Services to better advertise the programs and the benefits of SB and/or DVBE certification. Third, the state may implement SB and DVBE goals more stringently on contracts. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, small businesses make up 99.2 percent of all employers in the State of California and employ 52.1 percent of the state's private-sector labor. As a result, “small businesses account for almost all of the economic growth the State has witnessed since 1975.”
To read the full study, visit: http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/PIO/SB/SmallBusinessStudy.pdf
In recent years, the State of California's small business (SB) and disabled veteran business enterprise (DVBE) programs, which aim to increase the utilization of these firms through various measures, has been accused of diluting the public works market and weakening the state's economy. A new study by two scholars at California State University, Sacramento challenges this assumption and claims that SB and DVBE utilization on state contracts is beneficial for California's economy.“The incremental value of the State’s awarding contracts to SBs and DVBEs is positive, resulting in tremendous net new job creation, creation of net new Gross State Product, net new labor income for California employees, and indirect business taxes,” the study concludes.One of the studies findings highlighted in a California Department of General Services (DGS) press release is that SBs and DVBES produce roughly 50 percent more economic activity per dollar than larger firms.In addition to crunching data, the professors' surveyed SB and DVBE firms, revealing correlations between bid attempts and bid success. “Bid success seems to be a function of the number of applications made. For example, 56.9% of the respondents who have bid two to five times have been successful at least once, and 85.4% of the respondents who bid for at least six contracts have been successful at least once,” states the study.Just over 60 percent of California's SBs and DVBEs have tried to obtain state contracts. Each year, the DGS attempts to contract at least 25 percent of all state contracts to SBs and 3 percent to DVBEs.The survey also revealed why more SB and DVBE firms have not competed for contracts. In the survey responses, over a quarter of the firms indicated that they were not aware of bid opportunities with the state. Still, an overwhelming majority of respondents – 76 percent - want to bid on state contracts.The studies results may have several implications for contractors and suppliers. First, it supports the continued existence of California's SB and DVBE programs. Second, it may spur the Department of General Services to better advertise the programs and the benefits of SB and/or DVBE certification. Third, the state may implement SB and DVBE goals more stringently on contracts. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, small businesses make up 99.2 percent of all employers in the State of California and employ 52.1 percent of the state's private-sector labor. As a result, “small businesses account for almost all of the economic growth the State has witnessed since 1975.”
To read the full study, visit: http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/PIO/SB/SmallBusinessStudy.pdf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)